[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 3: IANA Considerations for undefined PRI values
- Subject: Issue 3: IANA Considerations for undefined PRI values
- From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 15:35:08 -0700
Issue 3: IANA Considerations for undefined PRI values
http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-12.html#iana
>From Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01213.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01218.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01220.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01226.html
The consensus appears to be to have a new part in the "IANA
Considerations" of syslog-sign stating the Facilities not defined
are open to future use by the consensus process (RFC 2434 page 6).
The current set of Facilities and Severities are listed by IANA here:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/syslog-parameters
Any disagreement to that?