[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 5: First Message Number - Still needs review
- Subject: Issue 5: First Message Number - Still needs review
- From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:04:25 -0700
Issue 5: First Message Number
http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-12.html#firstmsg
>From Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01228.html
Similar to Issue 4, should the value of "0" or "1" be used as the
lowest available value? Albert again suggests "0". Any disagreement
to that?
STATUS: No direct responses to this issue but Anton Okmianski suggests
using "1" as the start for ordinal values.
>From the Archive (see point 4)
http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01265.html