[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New Milestones and Dates
Chris,
as far as syslog-protocol is concerned, I think these are realistic
milestones/dates. I am sure we can meet mid-year if nothing really bad
shows up.
Rainer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:clonvick@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:13 PM
> To: syslog-sec@employees.org
> Subject: New Milestones and Dates
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've updated the WG web page:
> http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/index.shtml
> In it, and on the IETF WG page, the due dates are a bit past due and
> don't reflect the way in which we are now proceeding. I'd
> like to propose
> these new Milestones and Dates.
>
> ---
>
> Jul 04 Submit Syslog Protocol to IESG for consideration as a PROPOSED
> STANDARD
>
> Jul 04 Submit Syslog Transport Mapping to IESG for consideration as a
> PROPOSED STANDARD.
>
> Jul 04 Submit Syslog Device MIB to IESG for consideration as
> a PROPOSED
> STANDARD.
>
> Oct 04 Submit Syslog Authentication Protocol to IESG for
> consideration as
> a PROPOSED STANDARD.
>
> Oct 04 Submit Syslog Internationalization to IESG for
> consideration as
> a PROPOSED STANDARD.
>
> Apr 05 Revise drafts as necessary to advance these Internet-Drafts to
> Standards Track RFCs.
>
> ---
>
> This will give us about 3 months to resolve issues in
> syslog-protocol and
> syslog-transport-udp so they may be submitted together. This
> will also
> give Glenn the same amount of time but it looked like many of
> his issues
> were resolved during the meeting. After that, we'll have the next 3
> months for Jon to align syslog-sign with
> syslog-protocol/transport, and
> for us to decide upon how we will address syslog-international. Once
> those are done, we can move forward with 3195bis and see
> about moving the
> documents to Draft Standards.
>
> Please send in your comments about these dates. Are we being too
> optimistic? Do the ID authors/editors need more time?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>