[Syslog-sec] While you are at it ...

["Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>]

I suggest the following changes

a) Update the boiler plates - new ones mandatory from next month

b) RFC9999 I find confusing, irritating even; normative references to I-Ds is
elementary RFC-editing, they deal with it every day; put in the I-D name and
trust the editor to sort it out:-)

c) RFC 2373 has a new I-D in last call; I think that that should be referenced.

d) 10.2 references 'time'; 7 has 'timequality'

e) 10.1 has monotonically (which I do not think you mean - see previous essay)

f) 9 is to be removed by the RFC editor; do we then go from 8 to 10 or does he
renumber 10, 11 etc?  Seriously, this should be the last section, or, if you
follow b), then remove it.

g) What is the relationship of this to RFC 3164?  I was expecting to see
something about this on the first page.

Tom Petch

_______________________________________________
Syslog-sec mailing list
Syslog-sec@www.employees.org
http://www.employees.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog-sec