[Syslog-sec] Editorial in draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-11.txt

["Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>]

Some minor suggestions

p.2 "..  standardization efforts for reliable, secure and signed .."

'signed' throws me somewhat - I assume this is a reference to syslog-sign in
which case, I suggest a informative reference to it.  And is 'signed' necessary?
I assume it means the very specific way of authenticating a message which for me
is already part of "secure".  It makes me think I am missing something (I am?)

p.4 ditto

p.4 "... instead **of** multiple times..." (insert of)

p.5  (add) RECOMMENDED (used on pp. 19, 28)

p.5 "...RFC2119 RFC 2119 [5]. "

p.12  "  OCTET   = %d00..255" (I don't think ABNF ranges can be specified with
..)

p.19 "STRUCTURED-DATE" (should be DATA)

Tom Petch



_______________________________________________
Syslog-sec mailing list
Syslog-sec@www.employees.org
http://www.employees.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog-sec